|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
|
![]() |
||||||||
Highlights/News 13/01/2014: The 2013 European Report, Think Tank Report and Analytical Study are now available. You can find them under "European resources". 05/12/2013: Officials of the European Union – Pension rights in the national scheme – Transfer to the European Union pension scheme – Calculation method – Concept of ‘capital value of pension rights’: Case C-166/12 Casta vs CSSZ. 24/10/2013: Family benefit – Child bonus – National regulation providing for a benefit to be granted by way of an automatic tax rebate for children – Non-cumulation: Case C-177/12 CNPF vs Lachheb 10/10/2013: Sickness insurance benefits - Entitlement to an old-age pension in several Member States - Burden of the cost of benefits - Member State ‘legislation’ to which the pensioner has been subject for the longest period of time: Case C-321/12 van der Helder vs CVZ 26/09/2013: EEA Agreement - Council decision - Choice of legal basis - Article 48 TFEU - Article 79(2)(b) TFEU: Case C-431/11 UK vs Council 19/09/2013: Directive 2004/38 and Regulation 883/2004 – Right of residence for more than three months – Having sufficient resources not to become a burden on the ‘social assistance system’ of the host Member State – Application for a special non-contributory cash benefit – Legal right to reside on the national territory: Case C-140/12 Pensionsversicherungsanstalt vs Brey 19/09/2013: Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation – Swiss nationals residing in Switzerland and working in Luxembourg – Grant of a parental leave allowance – Concept of a ‘family benefit’: Case C-216/12 and 217/12 CNFP vs Hliddal and Bornand 16/05/2013: Old-age benefits – Habitual residence in two different Member States – A survivor's pension received in one of those States and a retirement pension in the other – Withdrawal of one of those benefits – Recovery of benefits to which it is alleged the recipient was not entitled: Case C-589/10 Wencel vs ZUS w Bialymstoku |
![]() |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
![]() |